Transvaginal Mesh Injury Lawyers in Denton
In spite of the many medical risks associated with the procedure, approximately 75,000 women had vaginal mesh implanted last year. Of the more than 300,000 pelvic organ prolapse surgeries that are performed each year, one third of them involve mesh implants. As of last July, the FDA reported that it received 2,874 reports of vaginal mesh complications between January 2008 and December 2010. Furthermore, many manufacturers of transvaginal mesh have been sued on account of the product’s adverse effects.
According to a deputy director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, “Given the absence of evidence for clinically significant benefit and the overwhelming evidence of very serious, common risks, use of synthetic surgical mesh products for transvaginal repair of POP is not ethically justifiable.”
Awards & Recognition
AWARDED TO JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION (2016-2020)
AWARDED TO JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION (2017-2020)
AWARDED TO JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA (2016-2020), JOE CAPUTO (2016 – 2020) & BURGESS WILLIAMS (2016-2017) BY THE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
AWARDED TO JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA (2009, 2011-2012, 2014-2021), JOE CAPUTO (2019-2021), BURGESS WILLIAMS (2019-2020), NEIL SOLOMON (2020-2021), & CHRISTINA HAGEN (2021) BY SUPER LAWYERS (A THOMPSON REUTERS COMPANY)
MEMBERS JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA (2017-2020), JOE CAPUTO (2019-2020), BURGESS WILLIAMS (2019-2020), NEIL SOLOMON (2019-2020), COLE GUMM (2019-2020), CHRISTINA HAGEN (2020) & BRENDAN MCQUAID (2020)
LIFETIME MEMBERS JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA & JOE CAPUTO
AWARDED TO ZINDA LAW GROUP (2016-2019) BY THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS
AWARDED TO JOHN C. (JACK) ZINDA IN 2015, 2016, 2017, AND 2020
AWARDED TO JOE CAPUTO (2016-2019) BY THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS
AWARDED TO ZINDA LAW GROUP IN 2018 BY INC.
Awarded to John C (Jack) Zinda (2021) by the American Association for Justice
I did not know what to do. I had never been hurt in a wreck before and this was a major accident that was not my fault. I reached out to Zinda Law Group and they were fantastic, answered all my questions, got me help immediately, and took care of everything!!
There comes a time when you need someone in your corner that you can trust. Our time came when we knew we needed the advice and counsel of an attorney. The day we walked into Zinda Law Group we knew we were covered.
There is a reason why this law firm has a 5 star rating. My experience with personal injury attorney Joe Caputo and all of the staff at Zinda Law Group has been excellent... I would definitely recommend Zinda Law Group.
Maria Ciara-Former Client
This is a really great firm! They settled my personal injury case in a year. Throughout the whole process, they were keeping in touch with me and helping me get the best treatment possible. They honestly know what they are doing. It was a pleasure working with these guys.
Everyone was so professional and was very interested in helping me with my issues. They were very upfront and honest about what I could expect.
I contacted Zinda Law Group after getting nowhere on my own with a personal injury case. I am so thankful I did. They took it off my plate and handled everything from appointments, to phone calls, and emails.
Lawsuits against Transvaginal Mesh Manufacturers
Among the manufacturers who have been sued are:
- Boston Scientific for its Scimmed’s Pinnacle pelvic mesh®
- C.R. Bard for Avaulta®
- Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson) Gynecare®
- American Medical Systems for AMS Apogee®, AMS BioArc®, AMS Elvate®, In-Fast Ultra®, MiniArc®, Monarc®, AMS Perigee®, SPARC® and Straight-In mesh®.
- Mentor Corporation
The magnitude of lawsuits speaks for itself with the following figures. As of May 2012, there were 313 cases filed against Boston Scientific, 457 against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division, 529 cases against AMS, and 740 cases against C.R. Bard.
Some of the proven side effects of transvaginal mesh products are erosion of the vaginal tissue, pain, infection, bleeding, urinary problems, pain during sexual intercourse, organ perforation, recurrence of prolapse or incontinence, neuromuscular issues, vaginal scarring and vaginal wall shrinking.
Transvaginal Mesh Recalls
To date there have been several instances of transvaginal mesh product recalls. In 1999, Boston Scientific recalled ProteGen®. In 2012, Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon recalled most of its brands- Gynecare Prolift Kit®, Gynecare Prolift + M Kit®, Gynecare TVT Secure®, Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System Kit®- after more than 1,000 lawsuits.
In July 2011, the FDA issued a warning in which it stated that “complications associated with surgical mesh patches are not rare.” The agency also declared that surgical mesh treatment was no more effective than traditional non-mesh repair.
In December 2011, The Committee of Gynecologic Practice instructed doctors to limit the use of transvaginal mesh patches.
In January 2012 the FDA demanded further testing and also began discussions of whether or not to reclassify mesh. The agency has chosen not to recommend a recall, but it is considering the reclassification of transvaginal mesh as a Class III device. Manufacturers must go through rigorous pre-market testing before being approved to sell Class III devices.
If you or a loved one has been a victim of the dangerous side effects of transvaginal mesh, contact Zinda Law Group to learn more about your rights. We may be able to help you move forward with your life by fighting for the settlement that you deserve. Call today for a free consultation.